The Yous in My Poems Form a Union
The Yous in my poem decide to form a union. They are tired of being exploited, they say, so they return the favor. They line up at my bedside at night to stare at me, waiting for me to open my eyes and acknowledge them; they only scatter when I threaten to write another poem about them. I vanish them to the corner with the other overused images—Icarus and his floating, the grace of God, amongst others—and tell them to think about what they’ve done, and I will write a poem about that, too. This is their bargaining chip. They know I cannot write about anything else, and they maintain the delicate balance between poetics and undiagnosed mental illness. They say they want differentiation. [ ] is not [ ] is not [ ] is not
7 thoughts on "The Yous in My Poems Form a Union"
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Love this!
Love the title, love the organized labor theme. I especially love how you animate your ideas and argue with them. (The touch of human works well, too.) Just a great poem.
Love the way this flows, and the notes of defiance.
I love the tone and inventiveness of this poem a lot
Amazing poem for the fact of forcing poets to think about the use of an overused pronoun. The worst pronoun. The pronoun that I consistently, for years, have ushered students from relying on. And while I certainly get your reasoning here, I think specificity, ugly as it may be, is the preferred choice. I also respect the offramp you provide. That is, to retain ownership. But is it also not the case that you are (as a poet with obvious readers (at least 5 as I post this) that you are in a privileged position, that the poet is in a privileged position to communicate with a reader and owes a kind of debt of responsibility to the reader for this privilege? I am interested in what you think and the craft of this. Thanks so much for this piece. I deeply appreciate the opportunity to read and think.
Love the argument between poet and her creations!
I take all their names away, so nobody knows who they are or what they’ve done, except me. We have rights, they say, rights to an honest story and fair representation, and I laugh in their faces. I tell them, this is what you get for loving a poet. You signed up for this.
So clever! You might work in the word “auditors” — the technical term for those yous.