Amid Gender (a tacit anathema borrowed from Cady’s God, among bumbling others)
Her Governess yawned
and spoke of threes,
and squeaked through her trebling sneezes:
“This symposium Plato’d imputed
to glib Aristophanes pealing,
proud, impertinent, peerless, parlous:
molds of men immemorially split
and women stripped from men
and women.
Like a witch tree, grown inexplicably seamless,
soulmates sealed sans scabs or sutures,
so were the wonderfully whilom wights;
no need for the pointed conceits of Donne
nor woebegone love songs shot across sizzling seas
and tumultuous oceans’ trammeling
troughs still slopped with splintered ships
or blown along lips of toppled bottles,
aping those dour dirges stirred from
deafening, dolorous, dun-colored doves.
And thereby wise and emulous gods
conspired to cripple and split them.
And then there was man and
woman alone, and man alone,
and woman and, yes, and
sprawled and luxuriant paddocks between them.
And man then swoln to an ox’s horn,
a blundering claymore bluntly clumsed,
and woman, a scabbard bedazzled and strapped
to a wrinkling leather’s cinching lip.
But now, by God, the blade is blurred,
some scumbled steel left limp as a dry-rotted strop.
And so, what slopping slag strange smithies turn,
some syphilis-eaten welder’s wild-eyed
passion pushed by illustrious interests—
to braid a trombone with a sinuous french horn.
Forms perfected, perfectly selfless,
metal untangled and mangled to furnish the folgerphone.
Fie— is flesh or metal more malleable, Mavis?
Or lustrous flesh and illumining mettle, then,
maybe much more our muddling measure…
Mettle, Mavis.
Nettling meddlers mucking around with mettle, now;
mettle the metal of character’s ribs
upon which gender’s skin is yanked,
or sex’s skin, the more, as gender’s a word
for a social role, really.
Is there inveterate mettle in men
or inveterate mettle in women, Mavis?
Why this hand-dug dyke, this ancient,
schismic rift, this old and oily, well-honed knife
between them?
‘Twas more than a chink ‘twixt Bottom and Thisbe?
And I, but Thisne’s sister snipped from a Pyramus,
though no Pyramus in me—
Must I, too, dismantle a horn, and
should its remnants seem some malformed thing,
no more than a mess of molten brass or silver
split to some thirty bits;
uncoiling miserably twisted valves
that honeycombed harmonies hurriedly round
to brush along bells that, tingling,
suckle inserted hands, some slipshod mutes
(that even emblazoned blowers of coiling horns employ),
blushed paunches piqued to but eke around wriggling
hands inserted in dampened bells, such unsoundable
breaths that a tortuous cage of umbrageous
ribs (aligned in dressage’s sharpest
knots) upends and clips to melodious throatsong;
whale’s ribs cribbing at crunching chests,
frail breasts exposed by a broken bodice
or bilboing ulus’ coy and careless slits
some emulous urge seduces darkly—
Although I’m a woman at heart, encoiled,
still splinted betwixt my milquetoast stilts
is a slippery personage flaccidly guilty,
plastered in sticky posterities strangled,
glued amid rueful fjords where
tickling echoes tease at tireless terms
that tweak still, wiring urging limbs,
rawed limbs of a sycamore’s slithering whims’
sussurant stocks, like locks of a termagant
pinned and twisted long past festering
bladders blotted, bloating, brooding,
burning, bleating, bleeding, blurting, burst
and bunged—
far cries from the fairer sex unsung.”
Then Mavis raged,
unpinning her frenzying frisson
(frank as a thrashing shark),
her trundling quern of cacophonous congers
cribbing at cravenly riffling riddles:
“My horoscope spoke of a frazzled flower’s
strangely invidious form unfixed
from moorings of moribund ugliness ushered and
touted by terse and fastidious luthiers’
itchily twitching fingers
fitting a finicky bridge on a fiddles’ unfinished and piebald chin;
what emollient rosin rubbed around rigidly
rose-racked strips of broken roans
to chafe of some staid and exquisite tension
shrilly disquieting screeches
scraped from the chillingly tightened tresses
twisted backwards bent and bound on balsa
posts, unfellable poles of a deathly day bed
foaming fanatical fathers forged from tortured trees,
from Rapunzel’s clipped and uncoiling pinions
wound on a bilboed winch, wanned topknot
of a tower teased from slouching slag and sickening rabble;
just bell jars drawn and cravenly quartered, crazing,
gas lit, scintillant, sapped to a vaporous specter,
gashed and sacred, vapid, sapid, clucked, then plucked
like a blue-footed chicken a cock-eyed farmer’d—
or pick at a dulcimer hewn from a creaking crate
or a clothesline clipped to a bucket and broomstick
scumbling rumbling figures
fun as a glibber rendition of Lysistrata
beat about bean tins, cast iron kettles, and pie-colored pyrex
bludgeoned and pummeled with dung-filled dildos’ pendulous plummets
pulsed across crackling glass;
what feminist missives lost to a louring limbo,
leering, lickerish riggers of rigorous trials
and wall-eyed glazier’s wryly dissembling gaffes,
slumgullion scullions scour, scrubbing at scurrilous scullery still—
Should you evermore dare to pinch me pink
or cinch up a swain in a seaman’s bib
or sex the unbearable brass that strictly stretches
estranged and belaboring breaths,
the blinding blots some bastard pinned about strangled staffs—
Fie on you. Fie.
And, finally, fie on you, ma’am or mister.
Know that I need not gnosh your notes,
some pianola gargling scored and studded tongues.
I need not piaffe before your morbid hem,
cocked swaddled in caustic colors that gleefully scream who rides me.
Fine! should you not know you’re more than merest
man or merest woman, merest mortal’s gnarled and marlorous bones
exposed to unsettling airs and upsetting stars—”
7 thoughts on "Amid Gender (a tacit anathema borrowed from Cady’s God, among bumbling others)"
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Now this is a piece of work! Love the sounds all throughout, the language, all of it!
Thank you! Very much appreciated!
oh poor Mavis. An unsettling poem. Nightmare images. trapped souls in misbegotten bodies. “gashed and sacred”
the horn section highlighted in my mind:
“Must I, too, dismantle a horn, and
should its remnants seem some malformed thing,
no more than a mess of molten brass or silver
split to some thirty bits;
uncoiling miserably twisted valves
that honeycombed harmonies hurriedly round
to brush along bells that, tingling,
suckle inserted hands, some slipshod mutes
(that even emblazoned blowers of coiling horns employ),
blushed paunches piqued to but eke around wriggling
hands inserted in dampened bells, such unsoundable
breaths that a tortuous cage of umbrageous
ribs (aligned in dressage’s sharpest
knots) upends and clips to melodious throatsong;”
this line I think betrays the poem: “as gender’s a word
for a social role, really.”
but maybe we have to give an oar out every now and then in the sea of what. ~~~small constructive criticism.
I liked the poem overall. I read it twice to marinate, the second time with music.
I appreciate and respect the criticism, and, in part, agree: it is an oar, maybe unnecessary here. I do feel like many things I write (and I’m beginning to become much more accustomed to this) seem lost in abstraction, sound, dissonantly mixed (albeit not immiscible) metaphors, or a density of symbols that in a larger body/series of work might seem more easily apprehended, but standing alone in a single poem (even if repeated ad naseum) might still seem somewhat bizarre, detached, or even arbitrary. I’m not Yeats, though I love Yeats, who can expand upon a symbol across an entire collection, making it ever more rich and real, while still having it seem palpable in a particular poem. I feel like our pal Leonard does that also, even expanding symbols across his entire body of work, like love as a manifold thing, the characters of God, Joan of Arc, the Songster, and Jesus; Boogie Street, etc. Where I feel like I fall short of these poles of my pantheon (at least in one particular way, as I know there are innumerable others) is in that certain words or symbols I relate to a particular, manifold meaning don’t really seem to hold that weight from the outset. In this, I thought I’d throw an oar, a very obvious suggestion of theme or opinion, to those who might entertain these stygian rapids. I’ve been listening to “Have One On Me”, by Joanna Newsom for about an hour and half (not quite in full) while I clean my kitchen and recall having not really gelled with the album until maybe a dozen, if not two dozen listens; in my density, it became apparent ONLY THEN what the album was really about, and how steel-cable strong that thread really rings all through it. Now, does the oar betray the character of the Governess? Maybe. You’ve a much better head for character than I, and it’s very much a dramatic piece, a set of call and response monologues a la Yeats or Browning (though, of course, in no way even grazing their scintillant hems). I’m glad you like it; that means a lot. What’s more, I’m happy you read it to music. What song(s)? I feel like, as of late, my greatest strength is in being (maybe a touch too) lyrical, even eschewing (in a few scarce cases) sense, symbol, and image for the sake of a telling and interesting, even a visually stimulating sound. I’ll end with this: I’m incredibly proud of this poem. It does the things (in my mind) that I’d like my work to do. It isn’t perfect, nor will it ever be really. I’ve even made a few corrections on my end, beyond the parameters of this forum. However, the way it took shape, extending first from the lines, “This symposium Plato’d imputed
to glib Aristophanes pealing”, and, on the other side of a three by five card, the lines you’ve quoted that illustrate the contortion of a french horn; then blooming into a pair of somewhat deceptively resonant monologues aggrandizing a kitchen conversation I skirted around; its somewhat conversational rhythm and pace melling well with the more jarring and strident starling-like lines; and its relatively clear characterizations (Mavis being a character I attribute monologues and dialogues to with incredible, albeit clandestine regularity; I’m kind of fiddling with a play that features Mavis as an adult among a slue of other women (I feel like it’s obvious she’s a child here, albeit a very verbose and articulate child, as she’s arguing with a governess)) are real achievements for me. What’s more, the fact that you read it and it made sense enough to have you suggest that a particular line might seem too obvious or out of place, really makes my day. So thank you. I hope the shoot went well.
P. S. I would of course, assuming you’d read aloud (as I know you’re wont to do), love to hear what voices you gave them.
This one I read in my head to Johann Johannson ambient mix from the film Prisoners. It was a dismal day for health reasons. A day of endless sleep. But this is the one of the many poems I read today while I slipped in and out of sleep and maybe it was my own dismality that made me think this poem was nightmarish tho it seemed as tho the narrator is trapped in a sense that is what i took from it. I think a lot of your work is beautiful and it could certainly use a middle ground to connect with the audience but as you said maybe itll take a thousand listens before the puzzle unlocks in the listeners mind. And then and there when I read your work I will say, this is a poem for the future. Tho the future be now sometimes we wont get the mystery until much later. I think a lot of your work you hide your true vulnerability beneath all the words and that’s why you never outright say anything but your words as lyrical as they are and the way you use them is why your writing is so fascinating and beautiful and best with music.
Thank you, Dylan. And go to know, and good insight. I did think it was strange that it appeared nightmarish to you, but I wasn’t going to argue. And I agree that I have a proclivity for welding a suit of armor from many slews of worming words. I hope you’re doing better health-wise, and every-wise for that matter.